Humanities and Communication

Culture and Society
Thesis Proposal 2. Culture and Society Researchers Research Group
 
Building Spaces of Resistance
 
We propose conducting an ethnography of the new forms and tactics of political and social resistance that are emerging today through the lens of event studies (Getz; Richards; Quinn). Social and political resistance movements can be characterized as innovative in terms of their rhetoric and collective mobilization. Currently, they produce a plethora of creations with collective representations and exhibitions based on crowd synchronization to achieve specific visual, emotional, and symbolic effects. These include colorful manifestations; the occupation of large strategic infrastructures; human chains stretching hundreds of kilometers; localized and networked displays of slogans and specific messages; mass festivals, and the saturation of landscapes with symbolic color. As national authorities may have opted to prosecute political and social leaders, the demand for anonymity has led some social movements to organize and plan events in new ways through new dramaturgies of collective celebration and resistance. Some movements also use technology to design and orchestrate protests.
 
Research projects that focus on what these new forms of resistance and disobedience, their rhetoric, narratives, design, actions and reactions, and technological appropriations tell us about the use and appropriation of political, symbolic, and public space are welcome.
 
IdentiCat
 
Critical Event Studies: Events as Drivers of Social Change in Socially Uncertain Times
 
Events such as festivals, carnivals, congresses, sports events, demonstrations, and contemporary rituals are analyzed within a research field known as "Event Studies". Currently, this field of study is expanding from business and politics to social, cultural, and contextual approaches (Getz; Richards; Quinn; Smith). This shift offers scholars the opportunity to address events as contemporary social activities with effects and actions, but also as forces that shape and transform societies. We have explored various aspects related to traditions, gender, sustainability, inclusion, social relations, networks, and liminality.
Thus, we offer guidance for research from a critical perspective, related to events and their consequences or potentialities for our society. We expect research projects to be based on social science methodology. The proposals should employ a qualitative methodology, but we also offer the possibility of working with quantitative measures. We encourage candidates interested in examining the role of contemporary events in our society.
 
The candidate may join the debate generated within the framework of the recent EU-funded HERA research project, titled "Festivals, events, and inclusive urban public spaces in Europe" (2019/2022).
 
IdentiCat
Neoliberalism in the "Gender Academy": Processes of Subjectivation and Resistance
 
This line offers two sub-lines of research:
  1. Obedience and disobedience in a neoliberal academic and scientific context from a gender perspective. What do ‘obeying’ and ‘disobeying’ mean, and how do we understand them in this context? How do academics and researchers discuss obedience? Where are the boundaries between obedience and protection? What disobedience practices can be identified, under what circumstances, and with what consequences? Can we observe any differences from a gender and/or generational perspective in the behaviors, discourses, and consequences associated with these practices?
  2. Neoliberalism in the "Gender Academy": the impact of evaluation technologies on the construction of subjectivities. This line aims to study the processes through which a management ethos has begun to govern academic and scientific institutions, which in turn has led to the introduction of competencies and skills foreign to this field. What impacts does this "intrusion" have on the processes of subjectivation and control of academics and researchers, and on the design of their academic careers? What are the consequences from a gender perspective?

Dr. Agnès Vayreda i Duran

Email: avayreda@uoc.edu

MEDUSA
Ecologies of Imagination

Thinking is training the imagination, producing possible images of what is not apparent, obvious, or immediate. In an immediate present that cancels all imagination except the apocalyptic, what imaginaries do we have today to enable new emancipatory visions of the present, past, and future?

Dr. Marina Garcés Mascareñas

Email: mgarcesma@uoc.edu

MUSSOL
The Neoliberal Transformation of Academia in the Humanities and Social Sciences: Effects and Resistance
 
The impact of neoliberal policies and practices has caused the most significant transformation in contemporary science and academia since the mid-20th century. Neoliberal academic policies have placed more emphasis on creating commercial value than on achieving social welfare or knowledge; they have encouraged the use of patents over the open dissemination of knowledge and promoted private investment in universities and research projects to support those research lines with higher commercial application and, thus, financial return prospects.
Existing literature on these issues focuses on the natural or "hard" sciences, such as the biomedical field, while areas like the humanities and social sciences have been much less studied. In this research line, we aim to analyze this almost unexplored terrain, using specific cases such as "digital humanities," and to identify and study initiatives or resistance experiences—both in content and organization—inside and outside academia.

Dr. Eduard Aibar

Email: eaibar@uoc.edu

MUSSOL
Visual Culture and Society
 
This proposal invites PhD candidates interested in exploring the role of visual culture in contemporary society. This includes examining photography, visual and performing arts, cinema, and video, as well as electronic media, focusing on the historical foundations of visuality and theories of visual culture and aesthetics. Candidates are invited to explore the role of visual culture in society concerning:
  • The symbolic construction of race, class, and gender
  • Visual dimensions of social life
  • Visual history of social practices and social artifacts
  • Art-based research and visual research methodologies

Dr. Amalia Creus

Email: acreus0@uoc.edu

 

Mutations of Doubt: From Methodical Doubt to Agnotology

Modern thought and science placed doubt at the center of their method for accessing truth and knowledge. Today, however, new forms of doubt have emerged, often systematically produced by powerful actors aiming directly to generate confusion, controversy, or ignorance. In the case of scientific knowledge, studies in agnotology have analyzed and documented numerous cases of systematic doubt production to create uncertainty or ignorance about what we already know (climate change, ozone depletion, the effects of tobacco, etc.), which are at the root of so-called denialism.
 
Phenomena such as fake news, the rise of conspiracy theories, or the collapse of imagination are also examples of these new forms of doubt. From a philosophical approach, we propose investigating these new forms of doubt and ignorance, their cases, and their conceptual and socio-political implications. We aim to analyze what kinds of transformations are currently taking place in the regimes of truth/falsehood and in the relationships between knowledge, ignorance, and truth, using both theoretical studies and case or sectoral analyses.

Dr. Eduard Aibar

Email: eaibar@uoc.edu

Dr. Marina Garcés Mascareñas

Email: mgarcesma@uoc.edu

MUSSOL
Relational Infrastructure, Social Capital, and Inequality
 
Research proposals to study how more homogeneous or more mixed spaces of interaction impact inequality and subjectivity.
 
Study of inequality from the perspective of the impact of interactions, social ties, and social capital. This proposal is aimed at those with knowledge in statistics and/or network analysis, or proficiency in qualitative techniques such as interviews, life history, or ethnography, who wish to join ongoing research exploring the relevance of social ties and capital that are formed differently depending on homogeneous or diverse interaction spaces in various institutional contexts (school, city, territory, leisure spaces, youth linguistic or cultural spaces, etc.) in the production and modification of symbolic boundaries between individuals and groups and subsequent social trajectories (inequalities).
 
IdentiCat
Youth Cultures, Styles, and Tastes
 
Research projects focused on specific youth cultures and styles or on the relationship between different styles, with the aim of understanding how they articulate boundaries and social meanings.
 
Youth cultures can be studied using both quantitative and qualitative methodological strategies, focusing on specific styles or the relationship between styles; on contemporary or historical cases; and in a single location or a broader geographical scope. The objective is to study youth styles as cultural productions that generate meanings and symbolic responses to the historical and structural contexts in which they exist (social transformations and various forms of inequality).
IdentiCat

Critique of Technodigital Reason

This research line critically examines the reason that governs our current times: technodigital reason. We define technodigital reason as the economic, behavioral, and ideological logic that characterizes the contemporary era, marked by the shift from homo machina to homo data, representing a second stage of what is known as big tech capitalism or data capitalism. This research line aims to create a space for thought within the field of governmentality studies, offering new critical perspectives on foundational contributions from authors like Michel Foucault, and contemporary figures such as Mariana Mazzucato and Evgeny Morozov, focusing on the forms of control that data ideology exerts over the modern being, the homo sapiens.

Dr. Ignasi Gozalo-Salellas

Email: igozalo@uoc.edu

MUSSOL
Reimagining political arts in the Anthropocene
 
The modern age turned the world into a place of exploration and exploitation, but the earth and the atmosphere, the oceans and the biosphere are no longer merely stages for human cultural and political life. Uncontrollable floods, megafires, heat waves, not to mention other ongoing disasters, are now a daily part of a complex network of processes and transformations that overwhelm the cultural and political institutions we have inherited. What began as a hypothesis put forward by geology, the Anthropocene has given rise to one of the greatest cultural transformations ever known. For several decades, its impact has driven a crisis in the modern conceptual framework, particularly the notions of politics and territory. Following the innovative work of Bruno Latour, Isabelle Stengers, Donna Haraway, Vinciane Despret, Frédérique Aït-Touati, Emanuele Coccia and Baptiste Morizot, it seems we must cultivate new "political arts" in the modern era: ways of doing things that centre on the question of how to inhabit the planetary catastrophe in plural and particularly non-modern ways. Theirs is a plea for research carried out in interdisciplinary collectives, investigating and experimenting with the generation of other habits and cultural and professional practices, combining the repertoires of the natural sciences with artistic and curatorial work or the action-research techniques of the social sciences. At a time when this type of initiative is flourishing, we would like to host study proposals from the environmental humanities on different cases, practices and attempts to reimagine political arts to inhabit a planet in crisis. 

Dr. Tomás Sánchez Criado

Email: tomcriado@uoc.edu

CareNet
Scientific Fraud and Integrity in Contemporary Research
 
The analysis of scientific fraud and misconduct can shed light on some fundamental aspects of science. For instance, the historical evolution of scientific fraud, from traditional “epistemological” manipulation — fabrication or falsification of data — to current varieties of “post-production” misconduct — aimed at enhancing publication impact — reflects dramatic changes in how science is evaluated and organized. We seek research proposals willing to analyze some of the most distinctive features of this new emerging style of scientific misconduct and link them to structural changes in the organization, funding, and evaluation of contemporary science.
 
Different methods can be used: from quantitative studies on “retractions” to qualitative analyses of specific cases. We are particularly interested in focusing on some recent notorious cases of alleged misconduct in Spanish science and how they have been handled by academic and governmental institutions, the media, and colleagues.

Dr. Eduard Aibar

Email: eaibar@uoc.edu

MUSSOL
Social Studies of Science and Technology (STS)
 
The so-called ‘Science & Technology Studies’ (STS) are an interdisciplinary research field that emerged a few decades ago, exploring different social aspects surrounding science and technology. At the intersection of disciplines like history, sociology, or the philosophy of science with a post-Kuhnian orientation, it promotes fundamentally empirical studies (using ethnographic, historiographical methods, or case studies) of specific practices, initiatives, and episodes in science and technology from a situated and critical standpoint against traditional perspectives of technological determinism, scientism, or the ideology of innovation.
This research includes analyses of the creation, design, or use of scientific knowledge and technological artifacts, paying particular attention to their social, cultural, and political contexts.

Dr. Eduard Aibar

Email: eaibar@uoc.edu

MUSSOL
Cultural Rights: From Inequality to Equity
 
Analysis, on one hand, of inequalities in various dimensions of cultural rights (participation, education, creation, production, and governance). On the other hand, the study of policies and projects that address these inequalities.
This research addresses questions such as: What factors influence inequalities in exercising cultural rights? How do factors such as place of residence, people’s origin, or gender affect access to and creation of culture? What kinds of cultural and social policies are being developed to respond to these inequalities? How is the public problem of inequality constructed within these policies? What implications and results does promoting equity in cultural participation through specific programs and projects have?
In short, the research analyzes culture as a key dimension in addressing social and urban inequalities.

Dr. Nicolás Barbieri Muttis

Email: nbarbieri@uoc.edu

 
The Public Value of Culture: From Instrumentalization to Democratic Transformation
 
Analysis and evaluation of the public value of cultural policies and projects, studying the shift from the instrumentalization of culture for economic and social objectives to processes of democratic transformation. This line of research addresses questions such as: To what extent do cultural policies and projects promote collective and equitable identities, fostering a sense of belonging to shared, yet socially diverse spaces? How can culture foster the autonomous and creative development of individuals, providing opportunities for learning, understanding, and engaging with current societies?
What policies can drive inclusive and sustainable territorial transformation, building new cultural centralities and recognizing people’s cultural capacities? Methodologically, this research advocates for innovative approaches to measure the value and impact of cultural projects using both quantitative and qualitative instruments (indicators, surveys, frame analysis, etc.).

Dr. Nicolás Barbieri Muttis

Email: nbarbieri@uoc.edu

 
Peripheral Resistances: Youth, Marginalities, and Forms of Political Action
 
PhD projects that seek to study and understand how young people from peripheral contexts respond to inequality and marginalization, primarily from a qualitative and/or ethnographic approach.
In recent decades, society, media, academia, and politics have placed a strong emphasis on observing young people's attitudes and discourse towards democracy and their political engagement, seeking to measure the extent to which they hold reformist, disruptive, or even reactionary ideas. This focus has often led to stigmatizing views of youth, especially in peripheral or marginalized areas. In these contexts, young people face structural challenges such as a lack of decent employment, social segregation, or increasing poverty.
This research line aims to deepen the understanding of these political forms, moving away from stigmatizing perspectives on youth.

Dr. Eduard Ballesté Isern

Email: eballestei@uoc.edu

 

Generative AI Oppression

Generative AI produced 15 billion images in its first year, a feat that took photographers 150 years to achieve. The societal impact of this technology has not yet been fully understood.

Especially concerning are AI biases. These biases reinforce stereotypes and perpetuate discriminatory practices regarding race, gender, or age, among others, mainly because generative AI models fail to capture the diversity and complexity of our society, prioritizing certain narratives over others.
 
This research line aims to study the different forms of production, consumption, appropriation, or regulation of generative AI technologies in relation to various forms of discrimination and exclusion.
 
 
Resistance and AI
 
This research focuses on the emerging global rebellion against AI oppression and the dominant AI paradigm, including its practices, myths, and discourses. It draws on shared experiences of how AI is affecting society and explores the different ways users strive to negotiate their agency on algorithmic platforms, which could potentially evolve into collective algorithmic agency actions, impacting technology development.
 
Resistance to AI often questions the ethical implications of AI systems, power control, and social equity. It may operate within or against the system, encompassing social movements, legal struggles, algorithmic audits, or reverse engineering techniques, among other strategies.
 
Communication Networks and Social Change - CNSC UOC
 
Coastal and marine cultures in transition: Knowledge, justice and resilience in the Anthropocene
 
Study focusing on changes in culture, communication and ways of life in coastal areas in the Anthropocene, with research into co-knowledge, community care, socio-ecological justice and narratives for resilience.
                 
 

SEC-History

Labciutats

 
Critical thinking and contemporary philosophy of emerging technologies
 
This line of research is part of the field of contemporary philosophy with a critical orientation towards emerging technologies that shape today's societies: artificial intelligence, robotics, biotechnologies and digital infrastructures. The main objective is to analyse the epistemological, ontological, ethical and political implications of these technologies from a plural, situated and critical philosophical perspective. It is based on the conviction that technologies are not neutral, but rather incorporate forms of power, rationality and knowledge production that must be interrogated. The research is linked to currents such as the philosophy of technoscience, cosmopolitics, critical epistemology, contemporary political philosophy and posthumanist theories. It promotes a reflection on the material and symbolic conditions that sustain digital infrastructures, as well as on the transformations of the subject, the body and life in the era of AI, biotechnology and the ecological crisis. This line aims to contribute to a deep philosophical understanding of the challenges posed by 21st-century technologies, while promoting dialogue between critical thinking, scientific practices and social transformations.
 
 
PACTS
 
Body, affects, gender and politics
 
This area of research includes the following sub-areas: body, gender and affects in relation to nation-building; masculinity and nation-building; gendered bodies and their political possibilities, affects and effects; use of the body and gender discourse as a political tool; masculinity and politics; gender and the far right; body, popular culture, sport, influencers and politics; feminism and anti-feminism; misogyny; and affective expressions, gender and politics.  
                
MEDUSA